Biking Advocacy and Race: Where’s the Disconnect?
This article is part of a series on alternative transportation and culture.
Walking and biking advocates of late have been perplexed as to why their efforts do not attract people of color. If we get our house in order, I’m sure they will start coming, remark board members of one sustainable transportation non-profit. Effectively promoting bicycling and walking to people of color will continue to be a challenge unless advocates take the time to understand the issues of communities of color as it relates to mode choice. There can be a monolithic image of biking, which continues to be perpetuated by the marketing and programming of many biking advocacy groups. This, in turn, dictates the demographic biking advocacy engages. That’s not to say that active lifestyles and sustainability are not the culture of ethnic minorities. In fact, people of color and lower income people are probably a larger cohort of bike riders than many people might imagine, but their relative absence from the biking advocacy world render them invisible.
Transportation advocates should take a hard look at the gaps in their discourse and capacity to cross cultural boundaries to address the needs of various groups and advocate for effective transport systems. This includes women, children, the elderly, as well as people of color – who all exhibit various preferences in transportation. Recently, when a map of Capital Bike Share usage in the Washington, D.C. area was published, some readers responded to the low rates of bike share usage in the largely African-American community east of the Anacostia River by pushing for the removal of the bike share stations in that area. Veronica Davis, an African American transportation planner, received heavy criticism when she attempted to tease out factors that may be influencing the disproportionately low rates of bike share usage including marketing, start-up costs, seasonal usage, topography, and urban form. Despite sparking some uncomfortable conversations, the dialogue stemming from her article offered insight and, from there, an array of proposals to increase bike ridership including increasing the number of stations, communicating explicitly the financial benefits of biking, re-thinking the membership cost of the Bike Share program, the time of year that the stations are introduced, outreach, and the long-term partnerships of the District DOT in the area.
Biking and alternative transportation in general are of particular importance to lower income and communities of color. Transportation is the second largest expense for American households after housing. The cost savings of bicycling as a mode choice as compared to a personal automobile would be most beneficial to households with less wealth. Moreover, people of color exhibit the highest rates of many chronic diseases, largely due to lack of access to healthy foods and exercise as well as a disproportionate burden of environmental degradation. Biking provides the opportunity to combat these effects through physical activity as well as the power to reduce the same pollutants that exacerbate these illnesses. Communities of color, lower income people, and other vulnerable communities also live in areas susceptible to climate changes. Bicycle infrastructure is highly adaptable as compared to the potential damage that other modes may suffer in light of these changes, and therefore, will continue to be a good investment into the future.
As documented extensively in transportation research, transit systems and advocacy have tended to take transit dependent communities for granted, focusing initiatives on seducing people who own cars to try other modes. As such, communities of color tend to have lower quality service than their corresponding level of ridership deserves. Biking offers a non-motorized mode with a critical level of mobility and access in communities with relatively low levels of car ownership and quality transit service. If for nothing else, bike ridership in communities of color is important to the general sustainability movement in raw numbers. While 7% of white households own no vehicles, 24% of Black households and 17% of Latino households own no vehicle. Given few other quality options, people of color and lower income people who do not own cars aspire to in order to increase mobility and access. Outreach to diverse communities, strengthening advocacy, and upgrading biking infrastructure is critical to carbon emissions reductions.
So, where’s the disconnect? If communities of color could arguably stand to benefit the most from biking as a commute choice, how aren’t recent biking advocacy initiatives effectively engaging these groups?
Perceptions.
With demographic changes taking place in the American urban core, biking has come to symbolize white re-population. In Portland, people of color called the bike lanes the “white stripes of gentrification.”
In reality, people of color do bike, but they may be a more silent, underground bike population. They made not ride on designated lanes, may not wear helmets, may not be tapped into the biking advocacy world, and may not be riding expensive bikes which, in total, could render them relatively invisible. Moreover, consider that should a Black man and a White man ride a bike down the street, they may elicit different assumptions from others. Among people of color, potential bike riders may also fear that they may be perceived to not have the financial means to afford other modes of transportation.
Safety.
Crime, violence, and/or gang activity — real or perceived — may deter people of color from riding bikes. The threat of one’s own bike getting stolen could also deter one from making the investment.
Discrimination.
Some people of color notice higher rates of charges for bike offenses than their white counterparts. Barbara Fair, a concerned community member in New Haven, Connecticut, took it upon herself to count bike riders on sidewalks and note who was being ticketed for what she calls “Biking While Black,” and she subsequently organized a protest to bring awareness to disproportionate bike enforcement. While police departments such as the one in New Haven keep the racial breakdowns of arrests, they do not keep track of bike tickets, which are infractions.
Police officers do admit to using bike enforcement to investigate other crimes, which may disproportionately affect bikers of color and particularly men.

A New Haven woman organized a "Biking While Black" protest to bring awareness to disproportionate bike enforcement.
Bike lane equity.
Given unbalanced advocacy efforts, unequitable access to designated bike lanes in various parts of town mean some groups are at a higher risk of being hit by a car and of being ticketed for riding on a sidewalk. In light of this, Barbara Fair, the New Haven activist, asked for a cessation of bike fines until there are is an equitable distribution throughout the town.
The geography of bike advocacy and programming.
Do bike advocacy and alternative transportation groups have lasting partnerships with institutions rooted in communities of color? What neighborhoods do the group rides often bike? What businesses does the group patronize during the bike ride? Where are the advocacy organizations offices and other bike shops and resources physically located? And, where are the bike lanes that these groups advocate for located? Do the imaging and style of programming reflect particular segments of the biking population?
Communication.
In focus groups in Portland, African-Americans consistently pointed to lack of familiarity of the rules for biking on the road and and bike routes. People in various cities have also expressed that they assume there is a high cost to bikes, high cost of membership for bike share programs, and that one should have a certain degree of knowledge about biking when in a bike shop. It is clear the some information about biking is not crossing cultural gaps. Part of that is language – getting information out in Spanish, Portuguese, and other languages is important to outreach.
Urban form.
Studies indicate that Black Americans have exhibited a trend reversal of migration from the south and, more and more, are moving to cities like Atlanta and Houston in search of jobs, lower rents, relatives, and culture. Many of these cities are less dense and offer fewer bike lanes as a percentage of the roadways in the city. White flight is also exhibiting a reversal, and, now for the first time, suburbs and suburban tract housing are more likely to be home to minorities than the urban core. The suburbs now have the largest poor population and are home to the vast majority of baby boomers aged 55-64. Bike-supportive urban form tends to be less prevalent in the suburban landscape, which is often shaped by highways and faster vehicular speeds on arterials. Additionally, communities of color that are in the urban core may tend to live in communities dotted by blight and vacant properties, as was pointed out by Davis in the issue of Bike Share in D.C.
Comfort.
For lower income people who may work in manual labor or in the service industry, the added comfort of driving in a personal automobile may be more important than one who may work a white collar job.
Given these disconnects, how might biking advocacy engage communities of color?
Allow for the incorporation of various styles in bike programming and celebrate style.
Expand the diversity of programming and stylization of bike programming to promote the evolution of bike culture. Check out this image of a drum circle at a group bike ride in Los Angeles.
In Oakland, the culture of improvising on one’s own car has now been translated into the art of biking. The Scraper Bike movement is taking off and making explicit the benefits of biking for youth of color in an engaging way.
This bike ride coordinated by Red Bike and Green ended with a party called: “A Celebration of the Art and Style of the Bicycle”.
Make explicit the link between the history of communities of color and biking.
Red Bike and Green, a cyclists’ collective, has flyers such as the one to the left, explicitly making the link so that a person of color might see their history as it relates to biking. St. Paul, Minnesota now has a Black Bike Festival, commemorating Major Taylor, the first African American cycling champion in the 1800s. Black Kids on Bikes, a group in Los Angeles, coordinates group bikes rides that they call “Freedom Rides.” Coordinating bike rides in neighborhoods of historical significance is also important. One interesting recent development is the conversion of the Underground Railroad into a bicycle route, along which slaves once escaped the South.
Foster an intergenerational, community-building opportunity by reaching out to families and existing institutions rooted in communities of color.
Many people cite the need for inter-generational space in communities of color, and bike programming could offer a place of fellowship and community-building. Partnerships between biking initiatives and existing institutions such as faith-based organizations and benevolence groups can support these efforts. Patronizing and promoting businesses owned by community members through bike programming connects biking to the larger community.
Images of intergenerational social fellowshipping as well as physical activity are positive reinforcements for the health of communities. One Black woman recently converted to biking notes of her first group riding experience:
…my heart was full. Here we were, a group of African Americans so large that we couldn’t be ignored – biking, exercising, building community, doing the things that we do regularly despite the stereotypes that suggest otherwise.
Communicate effectively.
Consider targeted outreach and the dissemination of information to demystify the rules of the road and the benefits of biking as it relates to communities of color.
Promote the sociality of biking.
Many see cars as the ultimate mode of social traveling, and see biking as a more solitary mode of travel. But, the social interactions allowed by biking are actually quite beautiful. And, the visibility of people of color riding bikes can inspire others to take it up, too.





Very interesting read. Just one quick comment, “they may illicit different assumptions from others” – I think you probably mean “elicit” there.
Thanks, Alexis! -Sara
really really important and necessary!!! thank you so much for writing this!!!
Pingback: flip flopping joy » Blog Archive » Biking Advocacy and Race: Where’s the Disconnect?
Very interesting article
Good article. I used to work for a bike advocacy organization and tried to get my (white) exec director on board with showing more support for adult bicyclists of color. At first, he expressed shock that people of color ride bikes. I pointed out to him that he already knew lots of kids of color who ride bikes, as we had programs in place working with kids of color, and those kids grow up to be adults. I pointed out that he had seen plenty of adults of color in the cities we worked who ride bikes to work etc. He scratched his head and remembered seeing some, but wondered if they weren’t just forced to by poverty.
I asked him how the presumption of poverty diminished the fact that they were on bikes. Well, he explained, it mean that that they probably wouldn’t be able to donate much money to our organization we shouldn’t put effort into supporting them.
I guess he thought it was okay to say all this to me because I’m white.
Needless to say, I was disgusted and left that organization for a more enlightened one. But I am now wary of advocacy organizations in general unless they make a specific commitment to working for bicyclists of all races and income levels.
Hey K, We’re working on putting together a panel discussion of this topic for a conference. Pop us an e-mail (or find Zakcq or Sara on Facebook) if you’re interested in contributing.
Pingback: Bicycle Photo » Cyclelicious
This is a thoughtful piece. Working with Portland’s Community Cycling Center on the Barriers to Bicycling project, which addresses this and related issues. Looking for more reading. Is there anything else out there?
Hey Jim, thanks for your great work! There are probably not as many sources as you might think, unfortunately. I found that some elements have been better researched than others; for instance, I found that the issue of walking is better studied than biking and more frequently from a public health perspective than that of the urbanist. But, if you let me know which aspects of the article you would like further reading on, I would be happy to either send to you or post here on the blog. – Sara Zewde
Excellent piece. It might be worth pointing out that bicycle-mad Portland is, historically, one of the “whitest” cities in America and that part of our town’s ast is that this was at least partly by design (due to anti-Asian and anti-Black laws in the late 1800’s/early 1900’s); and also due to “redlining” real estate practices that consolidated the city’s Black population into only a few neighborhoods in NE Portland. Self-styled bicycle “activists” in cities with especially high percentages of white residents and correspondingly low percentages of residents of color may not percieve that there is even an issue with the disconnect you describe. Some important work is being done to examine the disconnect and find ways to bridge the gap in Portland at the Community Cycling Center, a non-profit that serves low-income families throughout the Portland metro area. You may find it useful to contact the CCC for further details.
Thanks again for a necessary and thoughtful article.
Where’s the disconnect? To the extent our society is intent upon dividing itself into racial and cultural ghettoes, an advocacy operating independently of these realities will be ineffective.
THe message is putting a bicycle between your legs can make for a better life and the messengers and their means should reflect in all its color, quirk, bias and absurdity this great big beautiful mess we call our world.
Pingback: Streetsblog San Francisco » Today’s Headlines
Really excellent analysis, and it provides direction as well. Maybe this is something we can use as a reference in Pittsburgh. Thanks.
Pingback: Bikes and Culture « King Neighborhood Association
The problem also is that a lot of bike advocates tend to be quite pushy or evangelical, passive aggressive or easily agitated, whenever you have a certain different point of view. That scares me away from any of those groups.
Pingback: A short guide to ‘transportation health equity’ – BikePortland.org – News | Lexicomane.com
Pingback: A short guide to ‘transportation health equity’ : Beezodog's Place
Pingback: A fitting tribute to Mark Bixby, and biking’s (not so) obvious appeal to fiscal conservatives « BikingInLA
Sara – could you use a social bookmarking site for articles you used here and others you will find in the future? I use Diigo and love it fir keeping track and sharing without emailing.
This article has a number of problems.
One, Latinos can be white, black or part of indigenous nations, as an ethnicity they transcend skin color (thus, describing them as a group as “people of color” is inherently wrong).
Two, even the term “people of color” is a bit of an antiquated misnomer, since most people on earth have melanin (i.e. complexions darker than what is considered white), so any attempt to lump all these groups of individuals into one class is completely unworkable from an advocacy perspective. It would be like trying to market bike usage to “people who have 20/20 vision”, this is a group that is so diverse, that the grouping itself becomes meaningless from a messaging perspective. Who you are referring to as “people of color” is essentially the entire population of the continents of Asia, Africa, and South America and every one of their descendants (with the exceptions of ones who over time have come to be considered “white”). You aren’t trying to figure out how to market biking to 5 billion+ people. Figure out who your actual target audience is.
Three, this idea of black bikers being “invisible” is odd and I can’t understand who it is in society that you believe can’t see these bikers. Bike advocates without melanin? Surely you realize that black bikers can see themselves, no? Perhaps you should also be exploring what cultural challenges are rendering some people incapable of “seeing” bikers who possess a healthy level of melanin.
Four, you should probably rely on empirical data: i.e. get researchers to actually speak to various ethnic groups to measure bike usage and determine why usage levels are where they are. This article is anecdotal data piled upon anecdotal data. You need empirical data before you can draw any reliable conclusions or form strategies (or even to determine if you need a strategy at all; you haven’t even proved there’s a problem yet!).
agreed on the “people of color” thing- it’ only takes having a conversation with a six year old trying to explain why saying “colored” is bad but “of color” is good to understand how ridiculous that phrase is!
Nice piece, and a very important conversation for our community to be having. I work for Rails-to-Trails Conservancy and this very issue is one of the drivers of our Urban Pathways Initiative, a national program that we are doing in communities across the country. Thank you for the focus I, and we at RTC, certainly understand that biking advocacy has to include everyone in order to get the equity we all deserve in the long run.
Thank you for your comment and your great work, Eric. Keep us updated on your efforts!
Great piece, a few things. As the Los Angeles County Bicycle Coalition, we have also encountered the same issues here in LA, and have started a program to reach out to Latino immigrant cyclists, one of the largest groups of cyclists. You can read more about our Spanish language education/advocacy work here: http://www.ciudaddeluces.wordpress.com We have also launched an initiative as the City recently approved its Bike Master Plan update to focus the first bike lanes/bikeways and outreach primarily in high need low-income communities of color.
We applaud the article, but it’d be nice if when you do future pieces to also discuss the issues facing Latina/o and API cyclists, who are also large segments of “invisible cyclists”, and who are on bikes already versus the other folks that need to be convinced, as you mention.
Otherwise, keep up the great work and hopefully more national bike groups will recognize the importance and invest in reaching out to more communities of color and not see it as “extra”.
I work with recent immigrant children and one of the few complaints they will ever make is that they miss being able to get around by walking or on a bicycle. This growing group (27% of the county where I live) is a natural constituency for bicycling.
Hello LACBC, thank you for your great comment! You’re absolutely correct about the issues facing latino cyclists. Let me know if you’d like to write something for the blog on LACBC’s program working with latino immigrant cyclists, or if you or anyone else who would like to write about their experience as a latino immigrant cyclist. Thanks for the work you do! – Sara
Thanks for the article. To Alan Page, No statistical analysis is needed because it is highly unlikely someone will disagree with the skin color divide. When the author says ‘people of color’ I read dark skinned people. When I was in Mexico, the people who were bicycle advocates were not dark skinned people.
I have personally witnessed the disconnect in bike advocacy. When I mentioned how bicycles routes were not planned for the black side of town, I was totally ignored because there was noone to raise a stink about the oversight.
Maybe you guys don’t want to hear this, but..I am a ‘person of color’ and the two people who introduced me to bicycles were a Latino and black man, eventhough the majority of cyclists in my city were ‘white’. That is the problem. I have worked with progressive groups and have seen or had people tell me that they were not comfortable around ‘people of color’. The bike advocacy disconnect is the same disconnect found throughout the rest of American society.
If my experience with other progressive groups is applicable, people fear not immediately connecting/feeling comfortable with new groups, not having anything socially in common with them. I have listened to enough progressive people/cyclists bash and degrade other demographic groups’ music, dancing, clothing, dating customs, whatever…that superiority complex, that disrespect of culture, viewing other people of ‘needing to be educated’ is not doing much to bridge any divisions. I know because when I hear that talk, I walk away thinking ‘why did I even try?’
Oh, and the progressive justifications for not including ‘people of color’ would astound you. I heard one such discussion in Chicago. It was completely sad.
Im all for friends first, cycling partners second. But you can’t become friends unless you share something in common. Not a cause but a love.
Second, there are other internal issues invloved. For one ‘people of color’ believing if they ride a bicycle alone someone can just run them over. I get warned of this all the time. It’s a fear based on our US history and the coldness felt by ‘people of color’ towards society in general – remember that avoidance thing, that taking their tax dollars and spending it on cronies without their knowledge, verbal racial harassment in the streets (happened to me last Thursday), etc.
Overall, no forums, convention speeches, etc are not needed. What is needed is a strong cycling leader to demand integration. I remember in high school, the debate team integrated when the debating instructor said “If I don’t see black people/hispanics here, in a couple of weeks, say goodbye to debating.” It worked.
Pingback: Plurale Tantum: A Look Back to Let The Conversations Continue! « plurale tantum
Great article, thanks for opening this conversation. I’d also add that low income minority neighborhoods are usually scarred by the horrible planning of urban renewal, which left in its wake massively wide and busy streets with little or no sidewalks or safe shoulder to ride on, no shade trees, and intersections that are confusing and unsafe even for drivers. The entire intuitive flow of an urban core was ruined by the racist policies of urban renewal, and the lack of walkable, shopable, bikeable or livable streets in poor and minority urban neighborhoods is an enduring part of that legacy.
Pingback: Invisible Cyclist Rides Again | Invisible Cyclist
Pingback: Biking, Race and Equality | Urban Health Solutions & Urban Health Partnerships
Pingback: Resources on Equity and Inclusion—Taking Your Biking & Walking to a larger community | S & G Endeavors